SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (405958)8/12/2008 3:52:46 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1576160
 
I used to be a trader and have forgotten more than you know. I repeat:

First, "by you" doesn't apply since I've never posted on the subject.

Second, if you don't think a hedge is a speculation then you might start with some basic education.

Third, there was a LOT of speculation in the oil markets, every reputable business paper has reported on the money going into commodities.

Finally, if the market wasn't influenced by speculation, then it couldn't have come down on the Bush change as you claim, because that didn't influence todays supply/demand by one drop.

So you're wrong in like three different ways... you are tripping all over yourself trying to create a case where no case exists, and getting caught in lies.



To: i-node who wrote (405958)8/12/2008 4:14:34 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576160
 
You are so terse when you lose.

I don't know about "losing", but I know that on this subject you are definitely wrong. But, like tejek, you would never admit your error, so there is little point in continuing on.

Unlike you, JF, CJ, myself, et al have admitted when we are wrong. You refusal to do so speaks volumes.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News