Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (38583)	8/12/2008 7:54:08 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218008

what do you think? Not interested in inserting myself into this to any considerable degree. I doubt that he was seriously proposing a Chinese genocide, however. The wording was not artful, but my take on it was that it was a criticism leveled primarily at the Chinese leadership for failing the common Chinese, with a McCainesque remedy attached. I can see how it would ruffle the sensibilities of a Sinophile, but an angry reaction to a tight literal interpretation may not be Confucian.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (38583)	8/12/2008 8:42:57 PM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218008

TJ Said "start 11 posts per above stipulated test, and see how you are taken" Why would any one care? I cant see any value in worrying about what a cabal of entgangled interest / opinion means to anyone with knowledge and forethought applied within thier own lives? Do you? PS> I didnt follow the early part of your dialog with the offending party....so...it was just this part comment that interested me. majority opinion of bought and paid for is always less reliable than any single random reply that included an iota of original thought......dont you think?. you know how much i like you so no offense intended...... PS addendum when you say; "i do not believe in banning, have never banned anyone, and have up until yesterday to facilitate the search, never put any on ignore" humbly i would suggest you review Locards Exchange principle....practice the art of proper characterization and both of your rules will be broken.