SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (261701)8/16/2008 11:31:42 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 793983
 
That picture in the background gives me the creeps.

Actually the whole subject gives me the creeps.



To: Carolyn who wrote (261701)8/16/2008 11:33:32 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 793983
 
She says he said he would have voted for the bill if it had been a federal bill, not a state bill. He's dead wrong at that level too.



To: Carolyn who wrote (261701)8/16/2008 6:00:31 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793983
 
This is the issue that may sink Obama. To vote against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act is inexplicable. He didn't have to appease any constituencies. NARAL was neutral, they would have given him a pass. Mind boggling....



To: Carolyn who wrote (261701)8/18/2008 10:49:19 AM
From: Oral Roberts  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793983
 
I don't normally get involved in this conversation but that is far and away the sickest practice I've ever heard of. For the One or any thinking feeling human to support this is just twisted. Abortion people didn't oppose doing away with this, WTF is the Ones angle?