Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (38871)	8/17/2008 9:34:03 AM
From: maceng2	Respond to of 218037

Nobody believes it, it's plain ridiculous. I argued with Raymond Duray about it for years, but my arguments got thinner. Some awkward questions just need a proper answer. Hadn't seen this one before. Message 24840368 Explanation?

To: KyrosL who wrote (38871)	8/17/2008 9:42:46 AM
From: glenn_a	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 218037

Hi KyrosL. ((Bush administration was complicit in 9/11 is not contrary opinion. It is insanity.)) May I ask you what you say this? Do you feel that there is no way that the American Government would do this to their citizens? Is it your belief that the evidence so clearly points to Al Qaeda that to look elsewhere is absurd? Or do you feel that is smacks of "conspiracy theory", and that such theories - like for instance the assassination of JFK - construct narratives that imply motive and causality that clearly is not the case. Or all of the above (smile). I'd be sincerely interested to know. BTW, my own personal belief is that this is not the work of the "Bush Administration" per se. It was the carefully-architected execution of a strategy to put American troops on the ground for a future in Eurasia. And not that this proves causality, but that's certainly what's happened. As such, it is the product of the US geopolitical elites - a consensus that reached across top US geopolitical strategies of both parties. I also agree with Mike Rupert that this this play for the Grand Chessboard was significantly motivated by the geological reality of peak oil. Regards, Glenn