Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (38927)	8/17/2008 11:46:04 PM
From: Webster Groves	Respond to of 217974

<getting out ASAP> Surely you jest. My precious...my precious oil...it's still there. With a megaforce embassy and dozens of large new bases, the US obviously has no intention of leaving Iraq. Remember the haggling point of last spring regarding the Iraqis reluctance to sign over control of oil to US companies and to grant immunity to US contractors. Does that sound like they think the US is leaving ? Besides, there have been a succession of reasons why the US invaded: WMDs, Al Queda, sectarian war, Iranian involvement, etc., etc. etc. As each one was refuted, a new one popped up. The result,the US is still there and going nowhere. I think you confuse rhetoric for action. Bush and company is still in charge, and rule by executive decree because the Dems don't want to rock the boat lest they lose a chance at the brass ring (please excuse mixed metaphor). The cabal is not exposed, It is as strong as ever. I'm not sure if Bush knows any of the players in Georgia, but I'm sure he can name two beach volllyballers. wg