SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (407713)8/18/2008 1:38:11 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572361
 
My guys have a better track record.

To be frank, "your guys" have wrecked foreign policy every time they've had a chance at it and our guys have had to clean it up one time after another.

Just like Bush getting stuck with Bin Laden because Clinton let him go on multiple occasions. Clinton blowing it in Somalia. Or Carter not having the ability to confront Iran. But Bush defeated Saddam once, Bush (his son) has defeated him again and brought him to justice. Reagan ended the Cold war.

I just cannot imagine what you're thinking. The liberals are FP disasters every time we elect one.



To: combjelly who wrote (407713)8/18/2008 1:44:46 PM
From: HPilot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572361
 
Sort of a moot point. NATO would have never approved of Georgia doing what they did.

I think it is pretty obvious they would have defended them for attacking Russians invading their country. I don't know if they would have advised it as a smart move, but they would have defended their decision. In fact recent news is that Condi Rice advised the Georgians not to attack the occupying Russians. Maybe they decided diplomacy wasn't working.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News