Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Shale Natural Gas, Oil and NGLs and ESA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jrhana who wrote (15)	8/25/2008 8:39:30 AM
From: jrhana	Respond to of 6160

Nancy Pelosi on NG: <the fact is that the supply of natural gas is so big and you do need a transition if you're going to go from fossil fuel as you say, you can't do it overnight but you must transition. Investment in wind and solar and biofuels and focus on natural gas, these are real alternatives, you have to ask yourself why, why is this administration not doing. This is the challenge of our generation, it's national security issue. President Nixon said we must end our dependence on foreign oil. president carter said, it's a national security issue, economic issue, it's an environmental health issue and moral issue to protect this environment.> politico.com ESA doesn't need a very high NG price to make a lot of money. A moderate price with a large flow of NG would do just find. They are somewhat equivalent to the pick and shovel guys during the gold rush who make the most money of all. Supplying all that necessary infrastructure is a lucrative business. Message 24832114 Message 24834885 Message 24840066 ESA is going to have plenty of work: <When the gas is in a pool big enough to remove, "we do not have today the infrastructure in north Louisiana to take that gas out" because of an insufficient pipeline system to handle it, Briggs told the Baton Rouge Press Club on Monday.> Message 24870696