Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (262447)	8/21/2008 6:36:30 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793883

He really is being an idiot. He's given about four different reasons why he opposed the bill, one of them being it lacked neutrality language. He was chairman of the committee that originated the bill. He could have inserted any language he wanted to into that bill! To me, it's part of the emerging Obama pattern. So Obama goofed. He just wasn't paying close attention to the bill. Obama is never paying attention to the job at hand because his mind is always on campaigning for the next, higher job. That's one reason Obama has always voted with "safety first" in mind. But this time he goofed and voted alone. So this is a good one to tag him, especially as this bill concerns abortion and this is a general election where the majority do not feel good at all about abortions that could possibly result in live births.