SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (83654)8/22/2008 1:22:09 AM
From: John Metcalf  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
After reading all the discussion on taxes, I am very satisfied to live where I do (in the country near a town of 20k). The property tax bill that came this week is 5% more than last year. Total taxes are less than 2% of "fair cash value" of my home, which is less than the property cost 11 years ago. Education gets 70% of the tax. General government (sheriff, maintenance, fire protection, courts, etc.) gets less than 20%. About 12% is for library (won't be cut because it levies its own tax), roads, airport, and water infrastructure.

No local elected officials receive full-time salaries or benefits. School board members are not compensated. Teachers, firemen, and police officers earn modest professional salaries. Pension obligations are funded concurrently.

The reason we have reasonable taxes and no lavish commitments is that we did not participate in the boom. Property here was never expensive, so on-going costs continue to be low.

The tax that short-changed me was Social Security. Had that money been invested, it would be returning more than I'll get from Social Security when I'm old enough.



To: mishedlo who wrote (83654)8/22/2008 1:35:27 PM
From: coug  Respond to of 116555
 
re: <<But you should see the nutty proposal I just read to postpone sewer maintenance to avoid cutting library personnel.

I bet that nutty proposal was written by an over paid, underworked admin just so she/he could keep their job. Pass the cuts onto something he/she(family) would NEVER use since s(he) would never swim in a public pool or need to borrow a book or read the mags and newspaper or use the computer in, gawd-forbid, a public library. Selfish to say the least if that is the case..

Transfer him/her to the sewer or library department to save 3or4 average salaries in those places...<g,ng>



To: mishedlo who wrote (83654)8/22/2008 4:08:02 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 116555
 
Me thinks you're in for a big awakening of "save that government job". The key is the ones with seniority will save their own bloated salaries first.