Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (411460)	8/29/2008 1:52:49 PM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 1585193

Ted, Joe, her bio would be a footnote on Obama's resume. Watching the convention, I came out thinking that Obama's dog ate his resume... Joe

To: tejek who wrote (411460)	8/30/2008 2:34:59 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 1585193

>>> be a footnote on Obama's resume. This is a really stupid remark. I've been asking for months for some of you people to explain just what about Obama's resume qualifies him for the presidency, and not one of you has been able to formulate a cogent response. Some, e.g., CJ, have just refused to try (the inference being that it is a tough assignment). Obama is clearly less qualified for the presidency than is Ms. Palen unless a lack of experience as an attorney somehow makes him qualified. He was a community organizer, who failed at that job; she was a mayor. He was a Senator for 143 days; she was a governor. And I can't help but think most Americans are going to view her life experience as far more compelling than a guy who really has no history other than frriendly associations with characters of questionable integrity. She could well prove to be a knockout punch.