SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (264309)8/31/2008 5:02:32 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 793955
 

The answer is simple: This is where Gore must be pulling our collective leg. Because most people who study the country's energy supply say that -- whatever you think of the motives behind Gore's idea -- as a real-life plan, it's a non-starter.


Maybe this is why Nancy Pelosi is declaring that natural gas is not a fossil fuel? If you just redefine gas and coal as clean energy, it suddenly looks more feasible. Remember, this is the left. Facts are just political artifacts to the left. You can cut them to fit.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (264309)8/31/2008 8:06:18 AM
From: Bearcatbob  Respond to of 793955
 
George Will asked where was the derisive laughter?



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (264309)8/31/2008 8:42:58 AM
From: quehubo  Respond to of 793955
 
If the USA decided it wanted to determine, execute and complete one major goal of say getting all household vehicles with less than 30 mpg highway off the road in 10 years it could not do it.

Gore is a fool and he clearly consumes more caloric intake than 10 poor people in India.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News