Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (22007)	8/31/2008 10:59:43 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 22250

bad spin try again

To: sea_urchin who wrote (22007)	8/31/2008 11:02:33 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

So you agree the libs are lying ? what scum balls they are, you agree ? you partisan hack

To: sea_urchin who wrote (22007)	8/31/2008 11:21:42 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 22250

Frankly, if it is Palin's child and not her grandchild I think, as a mother, she's a heartless woman to bring such a child into the world knowing full well her time will be spent in politics and she will therefore not be able to devote the necessary care and attention to the affected child. I think that's a bit out of line.. She's certainly not heartless. While I might have my own reservations were I to be in a similar situation with a woman, it's not your right to judge her spiritual values about the sanctity of life. That's her own spiritual belief and she's entitled to act upon it in her private life. Now.. legislating such beliefs into law is whole different matter, but what she decides privately is her right as an individual. And from her perspective, if her child brings her joy, and vice versa, she should be supported in that decision. Thus, you sir, are the heartless one. Hawk