Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (43622)	9/1/2008 4:16:48 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224704

smile. I'm not sure. She was a tad... perhaps... 'wild'? But I think she was trashed for certain reasons. But clearly it is her who raised her sons to the age when they were instilled with her being and became the kind gentle men they are. Yes, I think she was quite remarkable in her way. I think she cared to raise her children beyond raising 'royals'. Is just a 'sense' I have. ;) But I am never a fan of going after the children. Or attacking a mother except in the most extreme of cases. The same is not done to fathers. And for a blonde... Diana was cool. smile. but... if she is not on the ticket, why did her name come up? I am just in general annoyed right now, btw. I might have missed a lot.