SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (43641)9/1/2008 5:34:28 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 224722
 
like Clintons Brother?, and Carters?, how about Hillarys?



To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (43641)9/1/2008 5:36:50 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224722
 
From NBC's Katie Primm and Mark Murray
By the way, as has been pointed out, Palin backed abstinence-only education during her 2006 gubernatorial race. In an Eagle Forum Alaska questionnaire, Palin gave this response to the following question:

Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?

Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.

*** UPDATE *** NBC's Abby Livingston adds that a McCain spokesperson in May 2007 said the Arizona Republican supported abstinence-only education, too. "Sen. McCain believes the correct policy for educating young children on this subject is to promote abstinence as the only safe and responsible alternative. To do otherwise is to send a mixed signal to children that, on the one hand they should not be sexually active, but on the other here is the way to go about it. As any parent knows, ambiguity and equivocation leads to problems when it comes to teaching children right from wrong. Sen. McCain believes that there are many negative forces in today’s society that promote irresponsible and dangerous behavior to our children. The public education system should not join this chorus of moral equivocation and ambiguity.”



To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (43641)9/1/2008 5:39:10 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224722
 
Obama couldn't discuss it even if he wanted to. Out of wedlock pregnancy is too common with his constituency.

* * *



To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (43641)9/1/2008 6:21:07 PM
From: Carolyn  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224722
 
Typical comment one would expect from a roach.



To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (43641)9/1/2008 7:05:55 PM
From: MJ  Respond to of 224722
 
See you pro-Obama are putting a full court press on Palin's family.

What's the problem? Think your Obamanista is going to be defeated?



To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (43641)9/1/2008 8:13:21 PM
From: MJ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224722
 
Have you raised any children? A young woman is not a slut who becomes pregnant by her boyfriend.

Did you ever experiment with sex? Were you the slut or were you the male gigolo.

Don't pull that holier than thou attitude-----if this were Obama's daughter he would have hidden the fact and mandated an abortion---killing of his own grandchild.