Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (412540)	9/2/2008 1:57:12 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1574260

Looks to me like 17 year old Bristol Palin is ALREADY having to take care of a baby! Maybe she just figured, why not let Jason squirt in her and have her own?

To: Alighieri who wrote (412540)	9/2/2008 1:58:39 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574260

To be honest, I am not sure I agree with what you wrote, but I can't help but think that a 17 year old girl is generally not ready for marriage...and an 18 year old boy is definitely not ready...particularly for parenthood. Idiot. T-total idiot. The child is pregnant already -- FIVE months. The choice is to kill a baby which is already viable outside the womb, or to do what they're choosing to do. Given the family is blatantly pro-life, it is no surprise what they're choosing to do.