Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (413458)	9/4/2008 9:19:07 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575207

McCain left liberals in the media in the dark and they can't forgive him for it. Somehow they seem to think it is up to them to not only "vet" McCain's pick but to "advice and consent". Joe I wouldn't have a problem with it but for the fact that they have flatly refused to "vet" Obama. They want Obama elected so badly they're willing to allow him to run without getting the slightest scrutiny.

To: Joe NYC who wrote (413458)	9/4/2008 10:43:44 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575207

Actually, it was reported on Cavuto today that McCain met with a group of individuals as far back as June and mentioned Palin as a possible candidate. So, it wasn't an off-the-wall choice as the liberal media has portrayed it. (Of course). McCain left liberals in the media in the dark and they can't forgive him for it. Somehow they seem to think it is up to them to not only "vet" McCain's pick but to "advice and consent". Oh please........the vetting was not done on Palin. That's as obvious as the partisanship in your posts. Don't forget that the NE is saying she had an affair.....just like they did with Edwards. What are the evangelicals going to do if that's true......blame it on her husband?