Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (82048)	9/4/2008 11:54:37 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542001

The priest, though, would prefer that abortion NOT be the way to stop a baby being born out of wedlock. Adoption is the answer in these situations. And so does the mother-to-be. She struggles and her God speaks to her directly. Let us not legislate that she has to have the baby. She has been entrusted by God to carry the baby and let her decide with her God and her priest until the baby leaves the body. After all we do not legislate whether the mother should or should not consume alcohol, or have sex with HIV infected partners while she is carrying the baby. So why legislate the birth? I could will you, a perfect stranger, anything I wanted to, so nothing prevents a gay person leaving his/her estate to their partner. The bequeathed property in the case of gays is not treated the same way as property between legally wedded couples. They are taxed differently.