SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (82258)9/4/2008 8:54:37 PM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542571
 
The principal goal is now to turn Iraq back to the Iraqis in all respects, and stop pouring our dwindling treasury down the black hole there. I am much less concerned with who gets credit for what, than knowing that young American soldiers will no longer be risking their lives from malcontent Iraqi car bombs and IEDs.

The US has more important priorities. I want Obama to get us moving on them, whatever it takes.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (82258)9/4/2008 8:56:31 PM
From: biotech_bull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542571
 
he maybe getting that issue out of the way - I think it's all going to be about the economy from here onwards



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (82258)9/4/2008 9:05:37 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 542571
 
It is the "Sunni Awakening" that is the reason violence has gone down.

And once the US troops draw down, violence between Shias and Sunnis will erupt. The war will only be won when the hearts and minds of the Iraqis are won. And that has not happened.


Just an observation, but your two thoughts are completely contradictory. If the "Sunni Awakening" is responsible for the drastic decrease in violence, then we shouldnt see it erupt after US troops leave.

Slacker