SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Natural Resource Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: isopatch who wrote (70943)9/5/2008 12:19:21 PM
From: Cactus Jack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108759
 
I'll never understand the energy expended bashing.

Thanks for sharing your calls and the basis for them; good food for thought.

jpg



To: isopatch who wrote (70943)9/5/2008 12:19:24 PM
From: JimisJim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108759
 
Another factor in PMs... shouldn't PMs have a little upward bias at this point with energy costs going down? Haven't we been told all year that energy prices were making PM miners' costs go up, hurting their revenues? Seems like the opposite should be true as energy prices drop... or am I trying to imposed logic where logic is a foreign word?

Jim



To: isopatch who wrote (70943)9/5/2008 12:25:19 PM
From: JimisJim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108759
 
Bought GG @ 28.71 vs. stopped out @ 30.30 earlier this week (as posted here)... 50% postition... just nibbling at the moment... prices sure look juicy on some favs... just hope they don't get too juicy at this point.

Jim