Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (44880)	9/5/2008 11:50:16 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	5 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

The article you posted is garbage, Ms Palin has long been on the record stating CO2 does not cause Global Warming. If you want to see some of my scratching. toms.homeip.net is an open directory of all kinds of articles, images, my spreadsheets and html files. I tell you what, my background is engineering. I have been doing it for four decade. When I first heard the hoopla several years back about CO2 driving global warming, I looked a little for any real science supporting it and found none. My gut said it made no sense. In the last two to three years I have spent several thousand hours looking and looking for real science explanations of CO2 and how CO2 was as trace gas that humans have increase by 1 part in 10,000 over the last several decades is supposed to globally slow down the escape of the earths heat and raise the temperature globally. All science demostrates CO2 global warming is a total and complete sham and any person who believes it is revealing they have a severe mental defect in their comprehension of the know laws of physics. The best and most complete examination and explanation of the actual know laws of physics and how they define the fuzzy ideas of CO2 global warming and greenhouse effect are found in this paper created by two PHD physicists. tsch.de Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics Dr. GERHARD GERLICH Institut für Mathematische Physik Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina Mendelssohnstraße 3 D-38106 Braunschweig Federal Republic of Germany g.gerlich@tu-bs.de Dr. RALF D. TSCHEUSCHNER Postfach 60 27 62 D-22237 Hamburg Federal Republic of Germany As well written as it is, this paper deals with complex ideas and is over many heads. But the truth it explains is a certain as a chess game configuration with a checkmate in N moves and the ideas of CO2 global warming are all fully checkmated.

To: puborectalis who wrote (44880)	9/6/2008 12:21:01 AM
From: Ruffian	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224729

Forget Palin, This Disgrace Is Third In Line; youtube.com

To: puborectalis who wrote (44880)	9/6/2008 1:56:34 AM
From: MJ	Respond to of 224729

What did Exxon do when the oil spill happened? Did they pay for any of the spill for any of the cleanup? The oil spill was 1989------Palin took office in 1996. How does this article square with her views on the environment. Which governments demanded $92 million? Was this $92 million in addition to amounts already paid. If the governments got the $92 million---what would they do with it? Get specific----this article has insinuations but it is not giving enough detail for the reader to have any knowledge of the facts. From the article: "Exxon Valdez oil spill damages. Palin refuses to push Exxon to pay the government for the unanticipated environmental injuries from the disastrous 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. Almost 20 years later, the private case is still unresolved and the governments likewise have yet to collect full payment from Exxon. Shortly before Palin took office in 2006, the governments presented Exxon with a demand to pay $92 million for this additional environmental damage, but her administration has since not pressed the issue nor taken Exxon to court to collect the money. Meanwhile, Exxon reaps record profits from Alaska."

To: puborectalis who wrote (44880)	9/6/2008 11:08:35 AM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

What climate change ?