Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ruffian who wrote (266352)	9/6/2008 12:48:20 PM
From: gamesmistress	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793974

Here's a link (from a Palin supporter, Beldar) with a fair bit of detail. Doesn't sound like something liable to sink anybody. And Monegan was offered a different position before he was fired, and in any case is a political appointee. And I still woudl like to know what the "bureaucratic" reasons were for not firing Wooten. Union rules? What would it take to fire a guy who did that stuff? beldar.blogs.com BTW, Wooten has an interview with CNN. cnn.com

To: Ruffian who wrote (266352)	9/6/2008 12:49:33 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793974

The raw audio, starting at minute 7: community.adn.com Palin says Bailey was acting on his own. Male bovine manure. Why would he get involved? Not his sister but it is his boss. This is good enough for me. The firing came out of the blue, with no notice, no reason. adn.com I agree with all the posts saying Wooten was a bad egg who deserved firing. But Monaghan's hands were tied by the Union. So, in a fit of pique, she fired Monaghan a guy who didn't deserve it. She now lies about her motives, lies to McCain. Sounds a lot like Hillary and the travel office to me.