Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (414557)	9/6/2008 1:54:42 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577019

She has cut billion dollar deals (or 40 Billion dollar deals). Obama lacks any such experience. That's the big difference. That's why she is so much more qualified than he is. However, when Obama made the ridiculous statement about handing over Georgia to the UNSC (where Russia has a veto), he lost ALL credibility in worldly matters. If you just pause and think about this for a millisecond, it tells you just how clueless the man is. When Obama said he would sit down with Ahmedenijad without preconditions, he permanently and irretrievably blew any opportunity of EVER appearing worldly, because nobody who has even a remote understanding of the world would make such a statement. When Obama supported surrendering in Iraq, he clearly showed what he was made of and can never, ever be considered for a leadership position in the United States. It is sad that the opposing campaign hasn't made this point, but it is a fact. I don't think Palin would have made any of these mistakes. If she makes such mistakes in the future, maybe she'll be disqualified. But there is nothing that can happen to undo Obama's disqualification at this point.