Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Keith J who wrote (44995)	9/6/2008 3:18:46 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

why is Obama more fit?? He hasn't run a thing, he was just a lackey for a crook and a corrupt organization, ACORN, a group the commits fraud every election. Is that what you want ?

To: Keith J who wrote (44995)	9/6/2008 4:10:23 PM
From: TideGlider	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

The terms of Use for the non market threads are far different than a stock thread. You ignore that there is a difference. I believe you will discover that soon enough. Ann, no offense, but regardless of your golden rule for this thread, everyone is subject to TOU

To: Keith J who wrote (44995)	9/6/2008 6:15:29 PM
From: tonto	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224729

You didn't see any lies? hmmmmmm...... Kenneth wrote the following post: To: tonto who wrote (42809) 8/29/2008 1:45:25 PM From: Kenneth E. Phillipps Read Replies (8) of 44901 *Palin's husband is an oil and gas tycoon.* And you wrote: I've now read every single post of Kenneth's so far this month, and I didn't see any lies or scurrilous remarks.

To: Keith J who wrote (44995)	9/6/2008 6:18:07 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

Looks like you were caught lying

To: Keith J who wrote (44995)	9/6/2008 8:20:54 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	5 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

Keith, have you ever been an officer in the military. I have not. But I have worked extensively with officers in the military and my daughter is a Bronze Star decorated Army officer. McCain served many years and I have no doubt picked up all kinds of executive equivalent experience. He has decades more experience in the legislative branch than Obama. Obama has zero executive experience, and has 20 years of mentoring by folks like the Reverend Wright. Now Palin based upon my reading of her Resume has amazing successful executive experience, and more importantly amazing getting it done successfully experience. Palin was a pick of genius, not an indication of a loose cannon. Now you say "Both parties are subject to corruption." Well Palin has a record of routing out corruption and obama has a record of Ayers, Wright and Rezko. Now McCain did do the McCain Feingold that I think was stupid, but it was honest stupid. So to me the choice is 99.9 to 0. MaCain Palin. And CO2 global warming is science of the mentally defective. Only Palin seems never to have been afflicted.

To: Keith J who wrote (44995)	9/6/2008 10:47:42 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224729

Keith, the fact you believe John McCain is 'a bit of a loose cannon,' speaks volumes. First of all, it says you're prone to believe liberal talking points. McCain never associated with a violent domestic terrorist like Bill Ayers, or called a bogus minister who damns the USA (and is a hatefilled bigot) his spiritual mentor. IMO Obama has already proven to be the loose cannon of the two nominees. His vision of a "restructured" America is an insult to this great nation. The USA cannot be improved by Barack Obama's socialist programs. They've already abysmally failed wherever they've been tried. The McCain-Palin ticket represents true change--the kind of reform the majority of US voters want and will receive starting Jan 2009. Kenneth has made false statements about Republicans. Apparently you believe the untruths as well. Primarily your opinion of Sarah Palin is the most offensive statement in your post. Palin is a highly qualified, reform-minded Governor of Alaska. Her extensive executive experience is far more valuable as VP than Obama's brief, unproductive record in the US senate, or his self-admitted useless years as a community organizer. Fortunately, American voters recognize the merits and superior quality of the McCain-Palin ticket. You can relax--in the end the USA and all it's citizens will have a far more prosperous and peaceful future with John and Sarah's wise guidance. How did your liberal bias develop--were you born into a Democrat family? >The questions to me is which candidate would be a more effective leader over the next four years once in office, given that there no other realistic options. Both McCain and Obama are senators, and neither have "administrative" experience. Is Obama less experienced, yes. But to be honest, I think he may show better judgement than McCain overall. McCain is a bit of a loose cannon IMO, and I think that shows in the Palin pick. And she seems even more of a loose cannon than McCain is!<