Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: anniebonny who wrote (10398)	9/8/2008 12:24:30 AM
From: SI Dave	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

Aw, what the heck... Oddly when I sent the letter to InvestorsHub at their Missouri address it came back. When I resent the letter to a New Mexico address I did hear back from them saying that is not their address but the Missouiri address is their proper mailing address. Really? I said in my letter that the PO box was the mailing address, and that the street address was for physical legal service (which cannot be done via a PO box). I guess that plain text wasn't plain enough. Nevertheless I have communication from them and direction for service of any legal documents. I enclose their letter to me wherein they deny liability but wherein they advise that they will provide the names of the bloggers if ordered to do so. Well, that's not really what I said either. I said we won't provide the information without a subpoena signed by a judge from a court of competent jurisdiction. That's not the same as saying we will provide it - we'll undertake that review if/when they meet the initial criteria. I will be filing a claim and a request to the court that InvestorsHub provide the names of the bloggers/subscribers who are constantly libelling you. First things first. Jurisdiction. We're in the US of A. Then we can find out what "libelling" is. The issuer cautions these individuals not to rely on the Defendants claims or assurances that these orders will somehow be thwarted or “squashed”. We made no such claim or assurance. Though long experience suggests that outcome is at least as likely as not. And "squashing" the claims... I like zucchini as much as the next guy, but that sounds real messy. The issuers corporate advisors counsel has gathered sufficient factums to support its claim of otherwise. Missing a few apostrophes there unless they are talking about multiple issuers and multiple advisors. Lots of vague references rather than naming names. And what the heck are factums? Facta perhaps? And, what's a "claim of otherwise"? Anyone? Anyone? The courts have dealt with matters such as YouTube.Com and Napster.Com for example where the users of these sites posted by unauthorized means content. And the weather guy on TV just said the forecast for tonight is for darkness, and that water is wet. Which has about as much relevance as Youtube and Napster. When one name drops it's usually advisable to use names that are at least remotely relevant. Our corporate advisor company has sent this Investors Hub a certain email attached hereto where amongst other things they seek safety valves to insure that the short sellers and stock bashers activities are rained in and thwarted. Oh, we'll get to later, time permitting. Especially if we get "rained" in. The entire litigation matter is being funded by the issuer’s corporate advisor, and this action shall not be a burden upon the issuer. The who of the what? Who is the issuer.. the person composing all of this gobbledygook? Who is the advisor? One of the principals of the aforementioned issuer? What is their legal standing in any of this? Do any of these nameless entities even exist? Approximately 15 additional and other issuers intend to join in this law suit as beneficiaries. Of course they do. More nameless entities. Did anyone besides me even keep reading this far? As per the solicitors email these documents being complex are being prepared and will be filed shortly. Complex? I can think of many more suitable adjectives. The issuer has also has posted an MP3 file of the interview and the issuers new direction on its corporate web site www.monacorporation.com Not. I checked and got the dreaded 4-0-4, and not nearly as presentable as SI's revolving 404 page at siliconinvestor.com.