SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (135138)9/8/2008 8:56:42 PM
From: LLCF3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
<The primary flaw in your complaint appeared early on. Then you bolster it with qualifications by some 'radicals' or 'forms' of creationism.>

There is NO flaw... that's exactly why I qualified the whole thing, to inform you of where I stand. In fact I think I even said part of the problem is all the different ideas of "creationism". If you teach one I like it's fine with me... I believe in god.

<Imagine a teacher who said, "scientific discovery helps to reveal the acts and consequences of God." >

Dude... evolution IS creationism.... unfolding.

But that isn't what most creationist want to teach as far as I know.

It's like all these MEN talking about abortion being murder.... just profoundly ignorant.

DAK



To: one_less who wrote (135138)9/9/2008 10:58:31 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 173976
 
They just don't go to the extreme and say it answers the question of origin

Darwin's theories were never intended to answer the question of origin of life. It answered the origin of species. That means that once life started it showed how it changed into more complex life. It's not relevant if there isn't the prerequisite - descent with modification. You don't get descent at the origin of life, it's not yet clear what you get.

TP