Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (39698)	9/8/2008 9:40:05 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218084

buy more gold

To: carranza2 who wrote (39698)	9/9/2008 8:45:10 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 218084

A US government bail-out of foreign investors Hank Paulson’s effort to prop up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has various beneficiaries but few gain more than foreign investors. One effect of the way the quasi-nationalisation is structured is that US institutions may well suffer more than foreign ones. In brief, it is good for overseas central banks and sovereign wealth funds but bad for US regional banks. The exuberance in non-US markets this morning is a reflection of that fact. The government has had to step in to reassure foreign investors who have become huge buyers of agency debt, but has treated US equity holders harshly. As Saskia Scholtes and Krishna Guha point out in the FT this morning, US regional banks could well pay the highest price: Fannie and Freddie’s combined $36bn of preferred stock is widely held by US regional banks. These banks will be forced to take significant write-downs of their holdings. Few banks have provided detailed disclosures on the extent of their holdings in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but among those that could be most affected are Gateway Financial Holdings and Midwest Banc Holdings. According to recent research by analysts at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, both banks have exposure that amounts to more than 30 per cent of their tangible capital. Meanwhile, foreign holders of agency debt including that issued by Fannie and Freddie have been given a cushion. The US government has not given full sovereign backing to senior and subordinated debt but it has provided comfort. This is very significant for all the foreign investors, including foreign governments and wealth funds that have piled into agency debt over the past 15 years, regarding it as a substitute for US Treasuries. They did not come up with this on their own. Fannie and Freddie travelled the world to persuade foreign investors that their debt was a good bet. It turns out that they were correct, at least about that. According to recent Treasury figures, foreign holdings of US agency debt rose from $107bn in 1994 to $1,304bn in June last year. This outstripped the rate of growth of foreign holdings of both US Treasuries and corporate debt. Recently, however, foreign investors had begun to get cold feet about agency debt. The FT reported last month, for example, that Bank of China had cut its exposure to agency debt over the summer. Mr Paulson thus found himself with a fait accompli. The federal government had to give reassurance to foreign investors in agency debt if it wanted to avoid chaos in financial markets and a run on the dollar. It smacks of debt crises past in Latin American countries, where the ultimate pressure for a bail-out came from foreign investors. ELMAT NOTE:We paid back everything with interest.