Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (135380)	9/9/2008 7:06:37 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	1 Recommendation Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 173976

she's not on any public assistance. Let me get this straight, - Excessive benefit payouts to public servants like Sarah Palin are not public assistance according to you (even though they are funded by taxpayers) - Alaska oil revenue payouts are not public assistance according to you (even though that money belongs to the USA and not Alaska and god knows we can use it with these Bush deficits) But aid for families with dependent children IS public assistance, is that what you are trying to say? In other words taxpayer funded pork that moves from one taxpayer to the recipient is FINE if its some white trash in Alaska that holds the same values as yourself, but if its a black person in a southern state then its "not ok"? Do I get that right? Because Bristol Palin is LIVING ON TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES, PERIOD. Her family lives on them, and she lives on them. She is producing a child on them.