Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (415871)	9/10/2008 12:27:46 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575023

What is interesting is that Keith doesn't really espouse liberal stance other than he doesn't like Bush and likes Obama. You do know that if a person "likes Obama", that identifies him, not as a liberal, but as an extremist liberal.

To: combjelly who wrote (415871)	9/10/2008 12:48:30 AM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 1575023

cj, What is interesting is that Keith doesn't really espouse liberal stance other than he doesn't like Bush and likes Obama. The fact he was identified as a liberal based only on his dislike of Bush tells a lot about the neos. Are you calling me a neo?

To: combjelly who wrote (415871)	9/11/2008 2:43:52 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575023

"That's because Olbermann tells like it is without mincing words." What is interesting is that Keith doesn't really espouse liberal stance other than he doesn't like Bush and likes Obama. The fact he was identified as a liberal based only on his dislike of Bush tells a lot about the neos. Funny you should say that. I don't think of him as liberal but more as a conservative in the vein of JF. Those are conservatives with whom I grew up and I feel perfectly comfortable around them even as we may disagree from time to time. This new group that has come down the pike is something else.