SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (84879)9/10/2008 3:00:07 AM
From: NOW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
? jumped the shark?



To: mishedlo who wrote (84879)9/10/2008 9:14:34 AM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
From: Paul Kern 9/10/2008 6:40:26 AM
1 Recommendation of 109023

Oil Investors Pulled $39 Billion in Futures, Triggering Decline

By Daniel Whitten

Sept. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Commodity index investors, blamed for record oil prices, sold $39 billion worth of oil futures between their July record and Sept. 2, causing crude to plunge, according to a report to be released today.

The work by Michael Masters, president of the Masters Capital Management hedge fund, blames investors who buy and hold an index of commodities for driving prices to records, and for their subsequent drop. It comes a day before the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is set to discuss its own study of energy trading with a congressional committee.

Masters testified three times before Congress this year, arguing that limits on traders would cut oil prices to $65 to $70 a barrel. He has been cited by lawmakers who introduced at least 20 measures to curb speculation. Congressional pressure on the CFTC to step up enforcement and restrict anonymous trades has pushed index traders out of their positions, Masters said.

``I don't think it's just coincidence that the money came out after the pressure was put on these folks,'' Masters, who wants legislation that would set limits on index commodity holdings, said in an interview.

Crude oil futures surged to a record $147.27 on July 11, an increase of 53 percent for the year, on the New York Mercantile Exchange, then fell 26 percent to $109.71 on Sept. 2. Oil dropped $3.08 to $103.26 yesterday on the Nymex.

``The speculators that drove prices up basically deflated the bubble,'' said Fadel Gheit, director of oil and gas research at Oppenheimer Capital in New York. ``They said, `That's it, the game is over. We are going to bet on another horse.'''

CFTC Report

The commission is expected to release a report tomorrow that will lay out its findings on the impact of index investors and over-the-counter trading on commodities. Regulators may require Wall Street banks to regularly disclose their energy futures positions connected to the unregulated swaps market, according to people familiar with the discussions.

JPMorgan Chase and Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Barclays Plc and Morgan Stanley control 70 percent of the commodities swaps positions, and swaps dealers are the largest holders of Nymex crude oil futures contracts, Masters said.

Representatives for all four banks declined to comment. Banks enter into swaps with airlines and hedge funds to profit from moves in crude prices and then offset some of that risk in futures markets such as the Nymex.

``These large financial players have become the primary source of the recent dramatic and damaging price volatility,'' Masters said in the report.

The commission has put out special requests for information from traders and imposed limits on the number of U.S. oil futures contracts a trader can hold on Intercontinental Exchange Inc.'s London-based ICE Futures Europe market.

Masters's Critics

Critics of Masters's earlier work said he lacks access to the data needed to draw his conclusions. His hedge fund is based in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Walter Lukken, the acting chairman of the commission, is among those who question the validity of Masters's data.

``Just as weather forecasters have no effect on the weather, energy speculators have no effect on the price of oil,'' said Scott Talbott, a lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents investors. ``His fallacy is that he ignores the laws of supply and demand, which determine the price of oil.''

Masters earlier this year reported that index speculators such as those that trade on Standard & Poor's GSCI accounted for $260 billion of assets, up from $13 billion in 2003. As of Sept. 2 that number was down to $223 billion, Masters said.

``For the supply and demand people, what I would like for them to explain is how from the supply-and-demand rationale you could have oil at $95 in January, at $150 in June and back to $100 in September,'' Masters said.

Hedge Fund Holdings

Masters's hedge fund held shares in the four major U.S. airlines, AMR Corp., Delta Air Lines Inc., US Airways Group Inc. and UAL Corp, according to a June 30 regulatory filing. Airlines hedge oil and have been hurt by commodity price fluctuations.

He said he extrapolates his numbers from agricultural data, which is publicly available, to arrive at overall numbers that include oil futures investments.

In arguing for legislation, lawmakers, primarily Democrats will point to the Masters report and a Massachusetts Institute of Technology report released in June alleging that speculation caused the rise in energy prices.

``Why did so much money come into these markets and why is it leaving,'' asked Senator Maria Cantwell, a Washington Democrat, in an interview. If Congress reduces scrutiny, ``do we see the run-ups happening again?''

CFTC data show that speculative net long positions in crude oil for non-commercial traders dropped from 115,145 for the week ended March 11, to a net short position, or a bet that prices would drop, for the week ended July 22, when prices started to plunge. For the week ended Sept. 2, net long speculative positions were 14,331.

To contact the reporter on this story: Daniel Whitten in Washington at dwhitten2@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: September 10, 2008 00:01 EDT



To: mishedlo who wrote (84879)9/10/2008 3:20:12 PM
From: NOW1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
oh i dont know that he did. why is his theory wrong? the part he didn't mention is the geopolitical apse ct of this: Russia was reigned in precisely at the time they were flexing the muscle this way: smack down oil



To: mishedlo who wrote (84879)9/10/2008 5:52:31 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
speaking of jumping the shark....

somebody seems a bit testy: (care to guess who?)

My Dear Friends,

I have fielded as many calls as any human being can. My first responsibility is to my corporate calls and they alone are beyond what any single person can handle.

You are all being run by the largest intervention in the shortest time frame any market on the planet has ever seen.

I am not your whipping boy so those who are wishing to use me as such cut it out. I am not opening any email from an address I do not recognize.

Today takes the gold ring for downright evil.

I have heard that crap about deflation and negative gold. Will you please click here to read the Formula and stop busting my balls? The synthetic dollar short is plain ignorance at a WORLD CLASS level.

I am not reciting to you what you refuse to read. I am finished with mean people.

THOSE OF YOU ON MARGIN DO NOT CALL OR EMAIL ME. You have injured yourself and everything you have touched. I have warned you AT LEAST 1000 times.

Please don’t call me if you refuse to read what is written here.

Nothing has changed at all. In fact, it has become fundamentally and significantly WORSE. If the stabilizers have panicked you then panic SELL everything gold you hold and get it over with.

If you think you are in the frying pan then buy dollars, maybe some Lehman, WaMu, Freddie and Fannie shares and jump directly into the fire.

If your investments are paid off in full with cash then what the dickens are you panicking over? Are you being run by the Bloomberg talking heads? Think for yourself, do not let the media do it for you. The truth is painfully obvious.

$1024 could be read. Three tries at $1000 before success could be read. A reaction could be anticipated, but not the intervention that entered the market at $960, $940 and $912. Technical analysis never saw this coming and never could have. Those that claim theirs did simply got lucky. Investigate their past predictions and reasoning behind it if you call BS on this claim.

Intervention has nothing to do with the markets. Only the precious few know it is about to happen. For the rest it comes out of nowhere.

Maybe your TA should be thrown out from here on in because those of you calling me today in total panic are being driven there by big money painting your damn little charts.

I cannot and will not encourage people who simply want to vent on me. Today is the end of the line for that.

Corporate Responsibility is first and foremost as it always has been, and even they must first read as well.

I HAVE A JOB TO DO AND I INTEND TO DO IT, SO EVERYONE ATTEMPTING TO STOP ME KINDLY GET OUT OF MY WAY.

For those of you who have taken the time to listen and protected yourselves, I applaud you.