Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (416598)	9/12/2008 10:06:36 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1578618

John, WTF do you not understand about "age appropriate"? I do, but it is a judgement call. I don't trust the judgement of the public school administrators. Joe

To: Road Walker who wrote (416598)	9/12/2008 10:19:57 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578618

>> WTF do you not understand about "age appropriate"? What I do understand is that it provides wide discretion for implementers. More importantly, there is no "age appropriate" discussion of HIV for K, 1, 2 graders. None at all. It is not an appropriate subject for discussing with them, period, end of story -- certainly not in a school. There is no age appropriate discussion of sexual conduct at all at this age, unless parents choose to have that discussion. You can't just write a bill like that and throw in, "Oh, yeah, we want it to be 'age appropriate'" in order to get you off the hook with parents. This is language that is used to get extremist liberal law on the books without the constituency having a clue what is going on.