Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (268083)	9/15/2008 2:11:49 AM
From: Patricia Trinchero	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794400

Touche! I have believed that a winner take all system would have been clearer and kept the party from being so divided.............The Dem leadership should have shut this thing down right at the beginning and they could have done it by failing to support one or another candidate.............instead they allowed their core constituents to go head to head for such a long period and it cost them dearly. The Dems let this relative newcomer take the election with the support of the liberal wing and he's likely to have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. America is filled mostly with moderates. The caucus system is ridiculous............how many working Americans can stay up half the night to vote in a caucus? They were decided by young kids and unemployed ( or other non working sorts). Got more to say but need to hit the bed! Pat