SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (268084)9/12/2008 11:28:47 AM
From: SeachRE  Respond to of 793999
 
>>a one in three chance that McCain would die in office<< It's even worse. McCain's latest Melanoma was very dangerous. The chance of metastatic disease appearing in a couple of years is high. Not to mention heart attack, strokes etc.



To: Bill who wrote (268084)9/12/2008 11:40:38 AM
From: Paul Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793999
 
Relying on Matt Damon to read actuarial tables is beyond silly.
The key fact that most people don't consider when talking about life expectancies is that your life expectancy increases with age. Ignoring the fact that McCain's mother is now 96 and very alive, McCain's current life expectancy is higher than the average just because he has avoided dying at a younger age. The calculation of "average" life expectancy includes the chance that a person is one of those that dies early/prematurely.



To: Bill who wrote (268084)9/12/2008 12:26:52 PM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793999
 
he did mention the table over a period of eight years.. i wonder what results were over four years.. after all that is all mccain is committing to as president.



To: Bill who wrote (268084)9/12/2008 12:41:09 PM
From: Shoot1st1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793999
 
an insurance company morbidity/mortality concerns would favor skin cancer over 2 packs a day if age/sex were same....as the smoker faces the possibility of multi organ disease....

the smoker would also face rating based upon "poor judgment" as if he would be a smoker today knowing what is known about the dangers....he too might drink to excess, drive too fast, consort with inappropriate individuals etc.

Stupid is as stupid does......

Th