Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (416935)	9/13/2008 1:32:23 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1579334

Of course you are, but as anyone who follows politics the controversial part of the national security document, and the one topic that generated a huge response was the pre-emptive doctrine. Again, that document was neither the genesis of the Bush Doctrine nor is it the overriding interpretation of it. In fact, the term is vague, even ambiguous. As soon as gibson asked the question, i knew what he was talking about and I am a common citizen. Yeah, of course you did. Would Obama have known what Gibson meant? I think not. He might have known enough to say, "Hey, which interpretation of it are you referring to?" But Obama has the advantage of two years of unvetted experience on the campaign trail. Krauthammer's rationale is pretty much impossible to argue with. I recommend you read it and take it heart. He is an authority, you can learn from him.