SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonto who wrote (46557)9/14/2008 1:08:15 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
This should make an unsettling impression on many liverals. Here is their great news agency downing the Ayatolla and Mullah control freaks !

Maybe the people of Iran are getting it right again. Maybe they will dispose of those killers.

Execution of Juveniles on the rise in Iran
Sunday, 14 September 2008
By Alireza Jafarzadeh
Source: Fox News

Less than a year away from its presidential elections in June 2009, Tehran regime is besieged by mounting political crises at the top of its leadership. In a bid to push back the fast-approaching wave, the ayatollahs are escalating their suppression of Iranians. The apparent lull in the international campaign against Tehran’s nuclear weapons program has brought no respite to those condemned to the gallows inside Iran.

Earlier this month, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) expressed grave concern over the violation of human rights in Iran. U.N. Human Rights official, Rupert Colville, told reporters "On the 27th of July, for example, 29 executions are reported to have taken place. A month later, on the 28th of August, another five people, including a woman, were reported to have been executed. In all, more than 220 people, including six juvenile offenders, are believed to have been executed this year in Iran already.''

"Iran's legal obligation not to impose the death penalty for juveniles was assumed voluntarily when it ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, both of which prohibit the death penalty for crimes committed by people below the age of 18,'' Coleville added.

International outrage over the wave of executions heightened in late August when the regime executed two teenagers, Reza Hejazi and Behnam Zare, for crimes they allegedly committed when they were under 18. On September 10, the state-run daily Etemad reported that the ayatollahs’ supreme court had upheld the death sentence for a 17-year-old boy named Hossein for a crime he allegedly committed when 14. According to rights groups, 140 minors are awaiting the death penalty in Iran.

The Italian news agency, Adnkronos International reported from Tehran on August 18, ''Four young people, who were minors at the time their crimes were committed, are expected to be hanged in the next few days.'' The report singles out ''Reza Hajizadeh, who at the age of 13 accidentally killed a playmate during an argument. He turned 18 recently and was immediately transferred to death row in Rajaishahr prison on the outskirts of Tehran.''

On September 4, the European Parliament expressed its grave concern over massive rights violations in Iran and execution of juveniles.

Political turmoil is on the rise within the mullahs’ ranks, parallel with rising protests and strikes throughout the country. The mullahs are trying to bolster their increasingly shaky rule with a rampant, systematic, and highly organized suppression of Iranian citizens and dissidents.

Since coming to power in 1979, the ayatollahs unique blend of religious demagoguery with abundant barbarity has been used to sow fear, confusion, and doubt in the minds of ordinary people to contain their desire and movement for democratic change. The main target of this campaign of terror against dissidents has been Iran’s main opposition, the People’s Mojahedin of Iran (PMOI/MEK) whose members, according to the State Department’s country report on human rights, are the main target of political executions in Iran.

For many years, Tehran’s goal of eradicating this group has extended beyond Iran’s borders. Europe became a roaming ground for the ayatollahs’ hit squads to assassinate political figures of the Iranian resistance. Tehran also sought and gained an invaluable tool to silence its opposition abroad, when it convinced western capitals, including Washington, to blacklist the MEK as a “good will” gesture toward Tehran.

Now Iraq has become the main staging ground for Tehran’s campaign to deprive the members of the MEK residing in Ashraf City, Iraq, of their rights to freedom, safety, and security as guaranteed by International Humanitarian Law and the Fourth Geneva Convention. In recent months, Tehran has relentlessly sought the transfer of the protection of Ashraf residents from the U.S.-led Multi-National Force-Iraq to the Iraqi government. The next step is to then put tremendous pressure on Iraq’s nascent and fragile government to turn over the members of the main Iranian opposition to Tehran, where they would be subject to torture and execution.

On August 28, Amnesty International issued a statement regarding this humanitarian crisis. ''Amnesty International has been monitoring the situation of members and supporters of the PMOI in Camp Ashraf. Following the U.S.-led military intervention in Iraq in 2003, about 3,400 members of the PMOI were disarmed by the U.S.-led forces at Camp Ashraf. Since that time PMOI members living in the Camp, which is managed by the MNF, have been designated as ''protected persons'' under Article 27 of the Fourth Geneva Convention which prevents extradition or forced repatriation to Iran as long as the U.S.-led Multinational Force (MNF) is present in Iraq.''

On August 14, in a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Senator Kit Bond (R-MO) wrote that Iran ''is working to end the U.S.-led protection of Ashraf and expose the MEK to pro-Iranian forces bent on eliminating the MEK as credible resistance force.'' Senator Bond urged the United States ''to retain the sole responsibility for their protection in accordance with the Fourth Geneva Convention until a workable solution can be achieved.''

In 1988, Khomeini’s regime carried out a campaign of slaughter, executing nearly 30,000 political prisoners, in accordance with Khomeini’s infamous decree: "Those who are in prisons throughout the country and remain committed to their support for the [MEK], are waging war on God and are condemned to execution.... Destroy the enemies of Islam immediately." Twenty years later, the ayatollahs are at it again. Prominent Members of Congress believe that the international community must continue to condemn Tehran for massive human rights violations and frustrate its campaign to create a humanitarian crisis for the dissidents in Camp Ashraf.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alireza Jafarzadeh is the author of The Iran Threat: President Ahmadinejad and the Coming Nuclear Crisis (Palgrave: February 2008).

Jafarzadeh has revealed Iran's terrorist network in Iraq and its terror training camps since 2003. He first disclosed the existence of the Natanz uranium enrichment facility and the Arak heavy water facility in August 2002.


ncr-iran.org



To: tonto who wrote (46557)9/14/2008 6:47:31 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
Ken believes "it was the worst of times, and it was the worst of times"--he's an exaggerator like so many other Democrats:

Quit Doling Out That Bad-Economy Line

By Donald Luskin, The Washington Post
Sunday, September 14, 2008; Page B01

"It was the worst of times, and it was the worst of times."

I imagine that's what Charles Dickens would conclude about the current condition of the U.S. economy, based on the relentless drumbeat of pessimism in the media and on the campaign trail. In the past two months, this newspaper alone has written no fewer than nine times, in news stories, columns and op-eds, that key elements of the economy are the worst they've been "since the Great Depression." That diagnosis has been applied twice to the housing "slump" and once to the housing "crisis," to the "severe" decline in home prices, to the "spike" in mortgage foreclosures, to the "change" in the mortgage market and the "turmoil" in debt markets, and to the "crisis" or "meltdown" in financial markets.

It's a virus -- and it's spreading. Do a Google News search for "since the Great Depression," and you come up with more than 4,500 examples of the phrase's use in just the past month.

But that doesn't make any of it true. Things today just aren't that bad. Sure, there are trouble spots in the economy, as the government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and jitters about Wall Street firm Lehman Brothers, amply demonstrate. And unemployment figures are up a bit, too. None of this, however, is cause for depression -- or exaggerated Depression comparisons.

Overall, the pessimists are up against an insurmountable reality: In the last reported quarter, the U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 3.3 percent, adjusted for inflation. That's virtually the same as the 3.4 percent average growth rate since -- yes -- the Great Depression.

Why, then, does the public appear to agree with the media? A recent Zogby poll shows that 66 percent of likely voters believe that "the entire world is either now locked in a global economic recession or soon will be." Actually, that's a major clue to what started this thought-contagion about everything being the worst it has been "since the Great Depression": Politics.

Patient zero in this epidemic is the Democratic candidate for president. As it would be for any challenger, it's in his interest to portray the incumbent party's economic performance in the grimmest possible terms. Barack Obama has frequently used the Depression exaggeration, including during a campaign speech in June, when he said that the "percentage of homes in foreclosure and late mortgage payments is the highest since the Great Depression." At best, this statement is a good guess. To be really true, it would have to be heavily qualified with words such as "maybe" or "probably." According to economist David C. Wheelock of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, who has studied the history of mortgage markets for the Fed, "there are no consistent data on foreclosure or delinquency going all the way back to the Depression."

The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) database, which allows rigorous apples-to-apples comparisons, only goes back to 1979. It shows that today's delinquency rate is only a little higher than the level seen in 1985. As to the foreclosure rate, it was setting records for the day -- the highest since the Great Depression, one supposes -- in 1999, at the peak of the Clinton-era prosperity that Obama celebrated in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention late last month. I don't recall hearing any Democratic politicians complaining back then.

Even if Obama is right that the foreclosure rate is the worst since the Great Depression, it's spurious to evoke memories of that great national calamity when talking about today -- it's akin to equating a sore throat with stomach cancer. According to the MBA, 6.4 percent of mortgages are delinquent to some extent, and 2.75 percent are in foreclosure. During the Great Depression, according to Wheelock's research, more than 50 percent of home loans were in default.

Moreover, MBA data show that today's foreclosures are concentrated in that small fraction of U.S. homes financed by subprime mortgages. Such homes make up only 12 percent of all mortgages, yet account for 52 percent of foreclosures. This suggests that today's mortgage difficulties are probably a side effect of the otherwise happy fact that, over the past several years, millions of Americans of modest means have come to own their own homes for the first time.

Here's another one not to be too alarmed about: Obama is flat-out wrong when he frets on his campaign Web site that "the personal savings rate is now the lowest it's been since the Great Depression." The latest rate, for the second quarter of 2008, is 2.6 percent -- higher than the 1.9 percent rate that prevailed in the last quarter of Bill Clinton's presidency.

Full disclosure: I'm an adviser to John McCain's campaign, though as far as I know, the senator has never taken one word of my advice. He's been sounding a little pessimistic on the economy of late, too. And to be fair, he isn't immune to the Depression-exaggeration virus, either. At a campaign news conference in July, my fellow adviser Steve Forbes warned that Obama was seeking "the biggest tax increase since Herbert Hoover and the Great Depression." Factual? Almost certainly not.

Entire article: washingtonpost.com