Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 10:55:37 AM
From: Bill	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224724

Ken, do you believe the fundamentals are not sound?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 10:57:15 AM
From: Ann Corrigan	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224724

Your favorite, Allen Greenspan, said the fundamentals are strong.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 11:02:39 AM
From: JakeStraw	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224724

Kenneth Yesterday - Blah, blah, blah.... Kenneth Today - Blah, blah, blah. Note to Kenneth - GET A LIFE DUDE!!

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 11:07:15 AM
From: JakeStraw	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224724

The Real Culprits In This Meltdown Barack Obama and Democrats blame the historic financial turmoil on the market. But if it's dysfunctional, Democrats during the Clinton years are a prime reason for it. ibdeditorials.com

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 11:29:33 AM
From: tonto	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224724

That is what I have been telling you, McCain and Obama are not the guys to hang your hat on for their economic policy. The numbers do not add up, and that is why you have not been able to support Obama's numbers. Watch out Kenneth, the deficit will climb!

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 12:11:25 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224724

Subject: Poverty and top ten cities > > > > What do the top ten cities with the highest poverty rate all have in > common? > > Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican > mayor since 1961; > > > > Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; > > Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; > > Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; > > Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; > > St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; > > El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; > > Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; > > Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; > > Newark, NJ(10th)...since 1907. > > Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing > over and over again and expecting different results.' > > It is the disadvantaged who habitually elect Democrats --- yet are still > disadvantaged.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 12:27:45 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224724

On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” McCain said he wants the commission “to find out what went wrong and to fix what's going to happen in the future so this never ever happens again. As president, I guarantee you, it will never happen again.” Lahdeedah.........he can't even guarantee us he'll be able to use a computer!!

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 12:29:13 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224724

21 electoral votes tied---not really, McCain's ahead: electoral-vote.com

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 12:29:44 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224724

Fighting an election on the economy against a backdrop of Republican rule and a Wall Street meltdown is, on paper, close to a dream scenario for the Democrats.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (46956)	9/16/2008 1:09:16 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224724

McCain wants to privatize SS(like Bush).....Would-be scenario..." none would have been hit harder than those who invested their Social Security payments in the stock market after George Bush privatized the system back in 2005. Republicans promised that retirees would earn better returns in the market, but instead, by sacrificing guaranteed retirement benefits and gambling on the whims of the stock market, poverty rates among the elderly are now on a scale not seen since the Great Depression."