SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (84954)9/16/2008 6:50:16 PM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541073
 
Since we exclude super lethal modern weapons from the second amendment, perhaps only personal weapons as lethal as those available when the constitution was written should be allowed. Such as single shot flintlock pistols and rifles, swords, etc.

Do you think that if we limit the lethality of personal weapons to that of the 18th century we would violate the constitution?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News