Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (85096)	9/17/2008 11:11:53 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541812

The point is, you, and apparently several other responders, give Obama a walk on everything he ever did that indicates he is unfit to be considered for the presidency. At one level, that's correct. I think he is fit to be the president. Much more so than McCain. I've read his first book fairly carefully, read much of his policy proposals, watched his senate career fairly closely and I don't see anything in all that that would even faintly hint at being "unfit" for the presidency. On another level, if you are arguing that I have no disagreements with Obama's policies/proposals, then you have clearly misread my posts.

To: ManyMoose who wrote (85096)	9/17/2008 1:15:10 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541812

Palin Selection Raises Doubts About McCain By DAVID IGNATIUS \| Posted Friday, September 12, 2008 4:30 PM PT In the military culture that shaped John McCain, there is no more important responsibility than the promotion boards that select the right officers for top positions of command. It's a sacred trust in McCain's world, because people's lives are at stake. McCain wrote in his memoir of the officer's responsibility for those who serve under him: "He does not risk their lives and welfare for his sake, but only to answer the shared duty they are called to answer." McCain made the most important command decision of his life when he chose Sarah Palin as his vice presidential nominee. Two weeks later, it is still puzzling that he selected a person who, for all her admirable qualities, is not prepared by experience or interest to be commander in chief. No promotion board in history would have made such a decision. Because of Palin's dynamism and political appeal, she's being hailed as an "inspired choice," to use President Bush's words. And she certainly has energized the Republican ticket: The polls show it, as do the enthusiastic crowds. And if a politician's primary responsibility is to get elected, this may indeed have been a sublime choice. But was it the right one? And what does it tell us about McCain? McCain is 72, and he has had a serious bout with a virulent form of cancer. Thus, he had a special responsibility to pick a running mate who could be, in effect, a deputy commander — someone who could take over for him if his health should fail. The country is at war, as McCain so often reminds us, and he was picking someone who might be responsible for the security of the nation. McCain's appeal is that he presents himself as a man of principle — a person who will do the right thing, even if it is politically costly. He did that in championing the troop surge in Iraq, and he has taken courageous stands in the Senate for years. He defied his party on issues he believed in — from ethics reform to climate change to torture. But John McCain also likes to win. And he has an impulsive streak, sometimes bordering on recklessness, which is described by many of his friends and by McCain himself in his memoir, "Faith of My Fathers." The desire to win, and the impulsiveness, converged in his decision to pick Palin — a bold move that has allowed McCain to regain his maverick identity. Palin is an immensely engaging political personality. But that doesn't make Palin a suitable commander in chief for a nation at war. She has almost no knowledge or experience of foreign affairs; no military leader would entrust command to someone so inexperienced or unprepared. Her performance in her first major interview did little to allay concerns. In speaking about Russia, for example, she was much sharper in tone than the Bush administration has been. Barack Obama faces a similar question, but he has been in the national spotlight for four years and has traveled, studied, prepared — and he chose in Joe Biden a running mate who is one of the Senate's genuine experts on foreign policy. The country will watch Palin's performance in interviews and debates, but right now she seems a genuinely risky bet. Thinking about the Palin choice, you begin to ponder other moves McCain has made on the road to winning the Republican nomination. McCain was right a few years ago to warn that Bush's tax cuts would have potentially ruinous fiscal consequences; now he favors extending the cuts that have produced a crisis of debt and deficit. Why did he switch his position, other than political opportunism? McCain even seems to have forgotten what saved his greatest legislative achievement, which is campaign-finance reform. When he was asked during the Saddleback Church debate which Supreme Court justices he would not have nominated, he named Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, David Souter and John Paul Stevens. It happens that those are four of the five justices who voted in 2003 to uphold McCain-Feingold. In May 2006, after McCain had courted the Rev. Jerry Falwell in an effort to win conservative support, I asked him if he was bending his principles for the sake of winning. "I don't want it that badly," McCain answered. "I will continue to do what is right. . . . If that means I can't get the Republican nomination, fine. I've had a happy life. The worst thing I can do is sell my soul to the devil." He was right. © 2008 Washington Post Writers Group

To: ManyMoose who wrote (85096)	9/17/2008 8:18:57 PM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541812

>>The point is, you, and apparently several other responders, give Obama a walk on everything he ever did that indicates he is unfit to be considered for the presidency.<< MM - That's not it. I don't believe Obama has done anything that would indicate he is unfit for the Presidency. I'm not giving the man a "walk" on terrible things he's done. I'm just not condemning him for things people he knows have said, or for having once tried on a Kenyan outfit, or things like that. I also don't interpret the Second Amendment as you do, nor do I think it's the most important issue facing the country today. - Allen