Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (22569)	9/18/2008 1:18:38 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 25737

The TED spread, a measure of fear in the credit markets, (the difference between what the Treasury pays to borrow for three months and the amount banks charge each other for loans, measured by the spread between the interest rate on a three-month U.S. Treasury bill and the three-month Libor rate) widened to 302 basis points Wednesday. That's a few ticks higher than it was on the day of the Oct. 20, 1987 stock market collapse, when it rose as high as 300 basis points. Prior to the current crisis, 'normal' was below 25 basis points for the TED spread....

To: pompsander who wrote (22569)	9/18/2008 2:23:27 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 25737

A dare Palin may come to regret September 18th, 2008 1:12 AM Eastern by Mosheh Oinounou embeds.blogs.foxnews.com GRAND RAPIDS, MI - Asked Wednesday to reassure voters about her readiness to handle foreign policy in the White House, Gov. Sarah Palin offered up a dare. “I’ll be ready. I have that confidence. I have that readiness and if you want specifics with specific policy or countries go ahead you can ask you can play stump the candidate if you want to,” Palin told more than 3,500 supporters at her first public town hall tonight in Western Michigan. The GOP VP nominee offered up the game of “stump the candidate” during her final response of the night in a town hall session where she otherwise successfully tackled questions on energy, Iraq and her personal life. However, in response to the final question of the night, from a supporter to asked for “specific skills” Palin will offer when it comes to foreign policy, Palin instead repeated that she is ready for office and dared anyone curious to quiz her on international affairs. While Palin’s offer of ’stump the candidate’ was partially meant in jest, media already eager to trip up the Alaska Governor on her perceived weakness now have even more incentive to—if ever accorded the opportunity to ask questions. The campaign of course has been extremely selective about opportunities to question Palin–she has only conducted two national interviews and has yet to take questions in a formal setting. Still, one of the last candidates to dare the media was former presidential candidate Gary Hart who, when suspected of womanizing, famously told the media “follow me around . . . . I’m serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. They’d be very bored.” He lost that dare.

To: pompsander who wrote (22569)	9/18/2008 2:28:10 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25737

Phil Gramm's fingerprints are all over market mess By FROMA HARROP Sept. 17, 2008, 11:22PM chron.com ''The fundamentals of our economy are strong," John McCain said as Wall Street went into white-knuckle panic over diving investor confidence. Does he believe that? It doesn't really matter, because the Republican has outsourced his economic policy to the ideologues whose opposition to regulations brought the financial markets to their knees. McCain's former economic adviser is ex-Texas Sen. Phil Gramm. On Dec. 15, 2000, hours before Congress was to leave for Christmas recess, Gramm had a 262-page amendment slipped into the appropriations bill. It forbade federal agencies to regulate the financial derivatives that greased the skids for passing along risky mortgage-backed securities to investors. And that, my friends, is why everything's falling apart. That is why the taxpayers are now on the hook for the follies of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Bear Stearns and now the insurance giant AIG to the tune of $85 billion. On Monday, McCain issued a tough-talk statement that he was "glad" that the feds "have said no to using taxpayer money to bail out Lehman Brothers, a position I have spoken about throughout this campaign." On Tuesday, the government did the daddy of all bailouts. It took over AIG, fearing its bankruptcy could set off a cataclysmic chain of events. And do you know where the problems lay at AIG? They weren't in its main insurance business. They were in its derivatives-trading unit. Last February, Fortune Magazine called Gramm "McCain's Econ Brain." Gramm lost the official title of economic adviser for making an impolitic remark about this being "a nation of whiners." But Gramm's belief in letting speculators do as they please was never an issue. And even after he left the campaign, Gramm had been mentioned as a possible Treasury secretary in a McCain administration. Another Gramm contribution was the "Enron loophole," which prevented federal oversight of Enron's electronic energy trading. Such favors proved very expensive to consumers but profitable to the Gramms. Enron CEO Ken Lay chaired Gramm's 1992 re-election campaign, and wife Wendy Gramm spent years on the Enron board, earning as much as $1.8 million, according to Public Citizen, a consumer advocate. So McCain's reassurances to the little people that he won't let what's happening to them happen again is rather unconvincing. McCain now talks about the need for more regulations, but he's been highly stingy with the for-instances. He wants a commission to look into it. (Too bad he didn't name Mitt Romney as his running mate. A former venture capitalist, Romney knows something about Wall Street.) The Bush economy was built on baloney. It was built on keeping interest rates low so that people could borrow lots of money to spend on real estate and at the mall. The resulting housing bubble left middle-class people feeling prosperous, even as their earnings stagnated or fell. The Democrats weren't exactly tigers on containing the housing bubble, but they did try to put the brakes on some of the lending outrages that are the root of the current crisis. For example, Barack Obama sponsored a bill that would have prevented lenders from pressing abusive loan terms onto unsophisticated, subprime borrowers. That went nowhere. "I certainly don't fault Sen. McCain for these problems," Obama said early in the crisis, "but I do fault the economic philosophy he subscribes to." Obama need not be so mild-mannered. McCain's economic philosophy is McCain's fault. He doesn't know much about economics — and has admitted as much — so his philosophy became a simple-minded faith in the opinion of others. And look whom he listens to. Americans will be paying for this philosophy well into the 21st century. Harrop is a syndicated columnist based in Providence, R.I.