Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (137669)	9/18/2008 6:14:05 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

It's really pathetic. whats pathetic is hearing your side try to defend Palin. it was obvious from DAY ONE that she was announced that this woman was way to lightweight for the job and it was a cheap election gimmick. You tried to argue her selection was a big win for McCain, which is was, FOR THE BASE- except McCain already had the base. Nobody else wants a lightweight like this for VP on a ticket with a 72 year old candidate. Are you still trying to claim she was a widespread WIN for McCain? Her negatives are fast approaching her positives just like GEORGE BUSH, and this election is being won in the swing states. Admit it, she can't handle basic interviews because she has no experience. That "Bush Doctrine" question could have been handled well by Obama or Biden, or even Fiorina or Whitman. You just laugh and say, hey Charlie I don't know what that refers to can you be more specific. This isn't high school we are interviewing for here. Governing easy when state's rolling in dough concordmonitor.com

To: Bill who wrote (137669)	9/18/2008 6:23:17 PM
From: Kevin Rose	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

That's not what happened. McCain asked her, she asked the kids, they all agreed, she accepted. Different from the Gibson story. EDIT: I see they've spun it further - she asked the kids after she accepted. LOL. Wonder what she would have done if the kids protested... Now, she's spinning her 'hilarious' comment about SNL into that she watched without the sound. Yeah right. Cause if she laughed with the sound on, her side couldn't pursue their bogus 'sexist' claim. People see through this crap, and are scared off by someone who will change their story to fit the needs.