To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (10043 ) 9/21/2008 1:51:08 PM From: Hawkmoon Respond to of 33421 Not saying that the ratings agencies shouldn't have some culpability here, but the only way to ensure it doesn't happen again is for everyone to take their medicine now. I think some people should go to jail over this. But it's going to be difficult to convict them when government officials knew, and in many cases, sanctioned/abetted their behavior. For example, permitting the 5 biggest investment banks run on 40:1 leverage seems insane. Presumably they were hoping to stress test their new financial computer models to see if the system could run at a faster velocity (which translates into higher economic growth). But when they fail to create the appropriate market clearing facilities for dealing with 62 Trillion in CDS obligations, it's clear the beast was about to devour it's "master".. And then we have the SEC failing to provide oversight on how the Ratings Agencies colluded with the Big Investment Banks to package, and then rate, all of those RMBS/CDO tranches which facilitated the inflation of real estate values. All of this was based upon subjective and unrealistic analytical models. And if you wanted to stay in the "game", you had no choice but to accept the analysis of the Ratings Agencies. You had to buy that toxic stuff because if you didn't, your competition would and you'd be crucified for "rocking the boat". And now all of this is exacerbated by "mark to market" accounting regs which ignore, intrinsic value of the asset underlying the security. John Mauldin is even calling for the suspension of FASB 157, which would go far to clearing up a lot of this mess, IMO:frontlinethoughts.com And NOW we have those very same Ratings Agencies using subjective and unrealistic analytical models to downgrade the credit ratings of the institutions who bought into (or insured) their original BS analysis. In some, the Ratings Agencies are either incompetent in analyzing risk, or they've become manipulative pathological liars who's models flip-flop depending on where the big money is betting. But it's certainly an issue when they've assumed nearly monopolisic control over assigning credit worthiness in such an arbitrary manner. But to get back on theme, if this situation was created by lack of regulation on the part of government agencies, then it's incumbent upon Government to play some role in providing mitigation and resolution, and thereafter preventing a reoccurence. Hawk