Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (10438)	9/21/2008 5:32:03 PM
From: SI Dave	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

I'll doubt the letter was sent. Doesn't really matter; it's nothing but a bunch of sophomoric hogwash and factually incorrect claims. A misguided effort to take advantage of the "in the news" anti-naked short bandwagon as if doing so gives credibility to the rest of the rant. How many Pinksheets.com "filings" and press releases of mergers, cease and desist letters, non-existent lawsuits, possible buyouts, special dividends, etc. has that outfit published under the guise of "news" only to turn right around and replace it with a different tall tale? I wonder if they would pound the table as hard for some regulatory scrutiny on alleged false information or rumors to drive up the stock prices as they claim to want for those allegedly intended to drive it down. After all, someone must be paying these non-disclosing promoters to spam the message boards day after day on behalf of their clients' stock. It all adds up to yet another piece of obfuscating inanities for the round file. For example: Oh, really? We removed all of the altered copies we found, including those re-posted by alleged "longs", and we put the originator into the "cyber jail" which he mentions with such disdain. (One does wonder how Mr. Zecevic came to be personally familiar with the iHub Jail.) Then we have this gem: There goes the old press release mill again with the noise about a lawsuit that doesn't exist and is barred by statute. Readers looking for any hook on which to hang their increasingly threadbare hat will applaud the missives, while those applying an iota of scrutiny will laugh and dismiss it for what it is: FUD.