SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (269797)9/22/2008 5:46:04 PM
From: mistermj9 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793972
 
There is no skit at SNL that could ever include the same slurs against Obama...thats one of my points.

Making fun of NY Times reporters is the thinly veiled cover...I didn't fall for it.

Somebody received high fives at lunch today for the high brow humor slipped right past all the rubes they were making fun of.

The purpose of the skit was to hammer home the point that Palin comes from a place so far away, and so backward that she can't possibly be considered for VP.

Which is fine...thats fair game for comedy.

But to then include the incest angle is vile...the skit had absolutlely no need for it...and that angle could never be used against Obama regardless of the subject of the skit.

I'm being cynical, we can disagree.