SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (48302)9/23/2008 2:50:30 PM
From: Thomas A Watson1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224729
 
In a small enough dimension there is no such thing as an equipotential surface. In fact unless one defines a range of potential that one considers equal, there is no equipotential surface. And I did not use google. Now you also have not defined the type of force that is what you consider potential. Did you think only one kind could fit a general definition. you are too ignorance of the details of specification to ever speak or comprehend science.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News