Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (269951)	9/23/2008 6:09:45 PM
From: gamesmistress	1 Recommendation Respond to of 793896

Someone must call these guys on this huge strategy of deception. McCain better because the MSM won't. Thank G-d for videos, the Internet and advertising.

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (269951)	9/23/2008 9:13:39 PM
From: ManyMoose	1 Recommendation Respond to of 793896

It all comes down to the fact that these two lawyers are separated from reality because they've done nothing but be politicians for their entire careers. They rely on the cuteness of their rhetoric to answer every question. John McCain and Sarah Palin both have real world experience. Obama and Biden don't.

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (269951)	9/24/2008 9:19:33 AM
From: Brumar89	4 Recommendations Respond to of 793896

Obama was all for coal - with CO2 capture and sequestration. That means he is for it - but effectively against it. He is for nuclear power - when the disposal issue is resolved - for it - but effectively against it. The dems are for off shore drilling - where there is no oil - for it - but effectively against it. Thats it - deception. Hide your real policy with weasel words. For clean coal, but really against coal cause its never gonna be 100% clean. For nuclear IF safely disposed of .... which means against nuclear cause nothing is gonna be safe enough. ------------- It gets down to voting for character and good judgment and common sense over "issues". A deceptive politician like Obama will always say his position on the "issues" is whatever he thinks it takes to convince people to vote for him. But the official formal position on issues is meaningless cause he doesn't mean what people think he's saying.

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (269951)	9/24/2008 9:19:58 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793896

Obama was all for coal - with CO2 capture and sequestration. That means he is for it - but effectively against it. He is for nuclear power - when the disposal issue is resolved - for it - but effectively against it. The dems are for off shore drilling - where there is no oil - for it - but effectively against it. Thats it - deception. Hide your real policy with weasel words. For clean coal, but really against coal cause its never gonna be 100% clean. For nuclear IF safely disposed of .... which means against nuclear cause nothing is gonna be safe enough. ------------- It gets down to voting for character and good judgment and common sense over "issues". A deceptive politician like Obama will always say his position on the "issues" is whatever he thinks it takes to convince people to vote for him. But the oficial formal position on issues is meaningless cause he doesn't mean what people think he's saying.