Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (419488)	9/24/2008 1:12:50 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575064

and these morons are still defending the indefensible ... That you, who are supporting a candidate with NOT ONE SIGNIFICANT ACCOMPLISHMENT TO HIS CREDIT, for the presidency and calling other people "morons" is truly funny. You cannot cite ONE THING Obama has done that qualifies him to hold this office. And other people are "morons"? How about everyone stick to the issues -- that is, the qualifications each of these candidates possess for holding the highest office in the land. Obama's foreign policy experience? The European Tour. Obama's Senate experience? 123 days. Obama's pre-Senate track record? Zip. Failed "community organizer". Failed at the practice of law. Handed things he could attach his name to in the IL legislature; nothing on his own. Wrong on the biggest issue of the day -- the Iraq War. Never challenging anyone in his party on ANYTHING in his 123 days in the Senate. What makes Obama more qualified to hold the office than, for example, Rachel Maddow or Keith Olberman?