SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (48687)9/24/2008 11:33:51 PM
From: LLCF1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224744
 
You're kidding right? I mean that's part of the plan... they don't want her to SPEAK, let along debate.

DAK



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (48687)9/25/2008 12:23:07 AM
From: MJ  Respond to of 224744
 
The normal procedures for the conduct of a debate is to allow surrogates to speak when a candidate can not be present for whatever the reason. This is routine in local and State elections in Virginia.

If the candidate themself does not appear, they often take flack from the opposing party as McCain is already taking because of his putting responsibiities in the Senate above the campaigning.

I've never seen a debate in which surrogates were not allowed to participate. Certainly, I see no reason that Obama should oppose having Sarah Palin as McCain's surrogate for that one debate or any surrogate that McCain would designate.

Have written rules been published for the debate before now?

mj



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (48687)9/25/2008 3:46:24 AM
From: siempre33  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224744
 
It's more like...Palin had better find a way OUT of any debates, just like John....Biden would eat here alive...
he WILL!...oh, maybe she can declare an emergency in Alaska or something..
LOL