SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: abuelita who wrote (78393)9/27/2008 1:21:36 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
well when she talked to Biden she was all sweetness, even when the moron said FDR was on tv in 1929. But with Palin she's all asshole. She shouldn't be on TV , she's a propagandist not a journalist.

I'm surprised you didn't see that. Are you a partisan hack ?



To: abuelita who wrote (78393)9/27/2008 4:56:32 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
And what did Reid say last week, no one knows what to do. you think couric and Cafferty will interrogate him on that statement ?



To: abuelita who wrote (78393)9/27/2008 6:44:03 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
as I said

Message 24999358

siliconinvestor.com



To: abuelita who wrote (78393)9/27/2008 6:56:02 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
This is the change you get with Obama

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Contact: Jessica Robinson, 573-751-0290

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.

“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.

“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”

governor.mo.gov.



To: abuelita who wrote (78393)9/28/2008 9:53:50 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
McCain says that he always puts country first. In this important case, that is simply not true.

By Fareed Zakaria
Columnist
NEWSWEEK
From the magazine issue dated Oct 6, 2008
newsweek.com

Will someone please put Sarah Palin out of her agony? Is it too much to ask that she come to realize that she wants, in that wonderful phrase in American politics, "to spend more time with her family"? Having stayed in purdah for weeks, she finally agreed to a third interview. CBS's Katie Couric questioned her in her trademark sympathetic style. It didn't help. When asked how living in the state closest to Russia gave her foreign-policy experience, Palin responded thus:

"It's very important when you consider even national-security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the airspace of the United States of America. Where—where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to—to our state."

There is, of course, the sheer absurdity of the premise. Two weeks ago I flew to Tokyo, crossing over the North Pole. Does that make me an expert on Santa Claus? (Thanks, Jon Stewart.) But even beyond that, read the rest of her response. "It is from Alaska that we send out those …" What does this mean? This is not an isolated example. Palin has been given a set of talking points by campaign advisers, simple ideological mantras that she repeats and repeats as long as she can. ("We mustn't blink.") But if forced off those rehearsed lines, what she has to say is often, quite frankly, gibberish.

Couric asked her a smart question about the proposed $700 billion bailout of the American financial sector. It was designed to see if Palin understood that the problem in this crisis is that credit and liquidity in the financial system has dried up, and that that's why, in the estimation of Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, the government needs to step in to buy up Wall Street's most toxic liabilities. Here's the entire exchange:

COURIC: Why isn't it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families who are struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries; allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?

PALIN: That's why I say I, like every American I'm speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health-care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy, helping the—it's got to be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health-care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans. And trade, we've got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing. But one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today, we've got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.

This is nonsense—a vapid emptying out of every catchphrase about economics that came into her head. Some commentators, like CNN's Campbell Brown, have argued that it's sexist to keep Sarah Palin under wraps, as if she were a delicate flower who might wilt under the bright lights of the modern media. But the more Palin talks, the more we see that it may not be sexism but common sense that's causing the McCain campaign to treat her like a time bomb.

Can we now admit the obvious? Sarah Palin is utterly unqualified to be vice president. She is a feisty, charismatic politician who has done some good things in Alaska. But she has never spent a day thinking about any important national or international issue, and this is a hell of a time to start. The next administration is going to face a set of challenges unlike any in recent memory. There is an ongoing military operation in Iraq that still costs $10 billion a month, a war against the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan that is not going well and is not easily fixed. Iran, Russia and Venezuela present tough strategic challenges.

Domestically, the bailout and reform of the financial industry will take years and hundreds of billions of dollars. Health-care costs, unless curtailed, will bankrupt the federal government. Social Security, immigration, collapsing infrastructure and education are all going to get much worse if they are not handled soon.

And the American government is stretched to the limit. Between the Bush tax cuts, homeland-security needs, Iraq, Afghanistan and the bailout, the budget is looking bleak. Plus, within a few years, the retirement of the baby boomers begins with its massive and rising costs (in the trillions).

Obviously these are very serious challenges and constraints. In these times, for John McCain to have chosen this person to be his running mate is fundamentally irresponsible. McCain says that he always puts country first. In this important case, it is simply not true.



To: abuelita who wrote (78393)10/14/2008 3:12:34 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Harper May Face Gridlock Even After Canada Vote Today (Update1)

By Theophilos Argitis and Alexandre Deslongchamps

Oct. 14 (Bloomberg) -- When Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper called today's election six weeks ago, he complained that opposition calls for more spending were putting the economy at risk, and parliamentary gridlock had stymied his agenda, including longer sentences for criminals.

After a campaign that saw him almost lose his lead in opinion surveys and then recover ground amid the global financial crisis, Harper may end up back where he started once the ballots are counted.

Polls point to Harper beating Liberal Party rival Stephane Dion without the ruling Conservatives winning majority control of Parliament. That would put Harper at the head of Canada's third consecutive minority government in four years and leave the legislative impasse unbroken as the country grapples with its sharpest economic slowdown in at least 16 years.

``Minority governments typically lead to paralysis on the big issues,'' said Nikita Nanos, an Ottawa-based pollster. ``The government tends to deal with small items and tinker as opposed to dealing with fundamental problems.''

The Conservatives had 34 percent support in a poll released yesterday by Nanos Research, the most accurate pollster in the previous election. Dion's Liberals were at 27 percent, followed by the New Democratic Party at 21 percent, the separatist Bloc Quebecois at 10 percent, and the Green Party at 8 percent. The poll has a margin of error of 2.8 percentage points.

Stocks Surged

Preliminary results will be available at 10 p.m. New York time on the Elections Canada Web site. Harper, 49, is in Calgary today and scheduled to vote in his district at about 1:30 p.m. New York time. Dion, 53, is flying to Montreal to cast a ballot in his district at about 6 p.m.

Canadian stocks surged, sending the main index to the biggest gain in 33 years and possibly helping Harper as fears about the economy dampen. The Standard & Poor's/TSX Composite Index jumped 12 percent to 10,166.56 at 12:40 p.m. in Toronto. A close at that level would be the steepest advance since January 1975. The benchmark fell to the lowest in three years last week, capping a 40 percent slide from a June 18 record.

Dion has attacked Harper for not doing enough to protect jobs and says his plan to penalize carbon-based pollution to finance cuts in corporate and personal income taxes will bolster the economy without raising overall tax bills.

Majority Threshold

A prime minister typically needs 40 percent of the vote to win a majority of the 308 seats in parliament, so Harper will probably have to seek support from the opposition to cut taxes on diesel and loosen foreign investment rules for airlines and uranium miners, bills he pledged to pass during the campaign.

The government's first challenge that could require cooperation from the opposition is to ensure the stability of Canada's financial system.

While Harper has said Canada's banks are sound, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty warned in a statement yesterday the government ``stands ready'' to prevent bailout packages in other countries from undermining the competitiveness of the nation's financial institutions. Harper on Oct. 11 said moves by some nations to bolster their financial systems may constitute subsidies to their banks.

Eroding Revenue

Another challenge for today's victor will be how to maintain the country's record of 11 consecutive surpluses as falling commodity prices and a slowing economy erodes revenue. Gross domestic product shrank in the first quarter of the year, then grew just 0.6 percent in the second. The Bank of Canada estimates growth of 1 percent this year, the lowest since 1992 during Canada's last recession.

If the economy sinks into a recession, as economists from CIBC World Markets Inc. and Bank of Nova Scotia predict, the government will either need to cut spending, raise taxes or allow the budget to move into deficit. All parties say they oppose deficit spending.

``I don't think that deficit rule is as hard and fast as some people say it is,'' said Rick Anderson, who worked with Harper as a strategist for the Reform Party, a Western-based block that folded in 2000. ``Cutting spending or raising taxes is the last thing you want to do on the eve of a recession.''

Surplus

The two previous minority governments -- one led by Harper -- had surpluses that allowed the prime ministers to pacify the opposition with higher spending. The next government won't have that luxury and Harper told reporters earlier in the campaign he'll postpone efforts on controversial policies such as relaxed caps on foreign ownership of phone companies or bank mergers.

Government spending, apart from interest payments, rose 30 percent over the past four budgets, including a 14 percent total increase in Harper's first two budgets.

``The problem with minority governments is that all can agree to spend money,'' Nanos said. ``It's very easy to be a minority government when there's a surplus, because there is fiscal flexibility. It's much more difficult when there isn't a surplus.''

Harper has built his campaign around the argument that he's a steady leader for turbulent times who will avoid disruptive tax cuts or spending increases. He also pledged to use less aggressive measures than Dion to curb greenhouse gases and warned his opponent's plan for a new energy tax would trigger deficits and recession.

Harper Proposals

Harper's proposals for new spending and tax cuts amount to less than C$9 billion over four years, many of them aimed helping small business owners and self-employed workers like truckers.

His message of moderation helped the governing party take a commanding lead in polls early in the five-week campaign. Harper's Conservatives polled as high as 40 percent, according to Nanos, before support began to wane in the last two weeks.

A Harper majority may still be one of the surprises of today's election, especially if the Conservatives do better than predicted in the French-speaking province of Quebec, where polls now show they'll lose some seats.

Other Surprises

Other surprises today may include:

*Dion's Liberals winning a minority of seats;

*Liberals and New Democrats winning a combined majority in

the legislature and forming a coalition;

*the separatist Bloc Quebecois becoming the largest

opposition party if the Liberals fare poorly.

With the emergence of the Green Party as a credible alternative, minority governments in Canada may become the norm, said Peter Russell, an emeritus political science professor at the University of Toronto and the author of ``Two Cheers for Minority Government.''

``Unless you got a leader who really took off, a multiparty system is going to make it very tough'' to achieve a majority, Russell said. Canada is likely to have more minority governments, ``mainly because the voters are divided in numerous ways.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Theophilos Argitis in Ottawa at targitis@bloomberg.net; Alexandre Deslongchamps in Ottawa at adeslongcham@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: October 14, 2008 12:55 EDT