Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (420892)	9/29/2008 5:30:39 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1573919

"That's what the argument is about, numbnuts." I know. It looked like you were trying to nuance your way out of it, though. "The man voted for a bill that, if passed, would have increased taxes on persons making 42K." Not true on several counts. For one, the only ones who would be affected were single tax payers with that income. Not your blanket "persons making" which includes families. In addition, that bill, even if it had passed, wouldn't have had that affect. That was a vote on a budget bill. It only sets targets, the actual amounts are set by appropriations and taxation committees. Regardless, that was only the one bill. If that is your idea of a history of raising taxes, well... "I don't want argue this in circles with someone who doesn't know an IRA from an exemption." It is only circles because when you try to veer off track, I pull you back. Who doesn't understand the difference between an IRA and an exemption?