Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (139356)	9/29/2008 8:22:59 PM
From: jlallen	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Not false....you're a hypocrite....proven many times over....there is no reason to assume Palin would use the power of the state to promote her religious views in any way which is illegal or abusive of her position...that just more pinhead libel....lying hypocrites like you make me sick.... J.

To: JBTFD who wrote (139356)	9/29/2008 10:16:44 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

If Obama has long been associated with a racist church which preaches and nurses historical greivances against the United States (and he was associated with such a church for two decades), the danger he'd use the power of the state to promote that religious view is certainly worthy of concern. What's the worry with Palin? That she'd promote speaking in tongues - even though she has never done so herself? Nonsense, since Obama's faith is a politicized one which is openly and expressly hostile to the US and a majority of its population, the concern his religious view would endanger or harm the US is much greater. Once again, we see the exact concerns expressed about Palin being much more legitimate concerns about Obama. But you and others are judging Palin because some of her fellow church members speak in tongues and because a visiting minister said a prayer of blessing in which he mentioned witchcraft. Clearly you don't consistently apply what you wrote above. False. When a person's religious philosophy might involve using the power of the state to promote their religious views I think it is a legitimate question to raise "How would your religious views affect how you would act as president or vice president" or whatever.