SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (87442)9/30/2008 10:59:56 PM
From: axial  Respond to of 116555
 
I hear you. While I don't agree, it's understood that's a rational alternative, which is respected.

Who knows? If lawmakers can't get their act together and give voters something they will approve, events may default to your solution anyway.

Jim



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (87442)10/1/2008 2:30:08 AM
From: John Metcalf  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
"I'm willing to give up SS and Medicare to balance the budget."

I am too, even though I am retired, do not receive either of these benefits yet, and would have to return to work if there were not a date when they could be expected. I could do this because I have no debt.

But most of the people reliant on Social Security and Medicare, with debt, can not survive such a move. A painful sacrifice to you and I may mean death to many others. Do you suppose Darth Cheney is war-gaming this possibility?



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (87442)10/1/2008 3:04:19 AM
From: Don Hurst2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Did you happen to see P.O.V. on PBS tonight? The "debt" of those without health insurance was not because of their "consumerist ambitions" and the idea that the richest (formerly?) nation on earth cannot provide affordable universal health care for its citizens is a disgrace.